web_tb_nawals

A “Clunker” of a Plan

by Published: Sep 23, 2009

Cash for Clunkers tem­porar­ily helped the automak­ers, but did noth­ing for consumers

Though the recent “Cash for Clunkers” rebate incen­tive sounded like a great idea, it did not stim­u­late the American automak­ers or help consumers.

The incen­tive pro­gram, for­mally known as the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS), was signed by President Obama on June 24 as a means to facil­i­tate car sales for Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler.

CARS was designed to allow peo­ple to save up to $4,500 toward the pur­chase of a new vehi­cle. However, there were many restric­tions and guide­lines for each type of vehi­cle being traded in and each type being sold.

The major issues with the so called “rebate” plan are not the cost of the vehi­cles them­selves, but the incurred costs that auto­mat­i­cally come with the pur­chase. The instant you drive a new car off the lot, it loses tremen­dous amount of value. A new vehi­cle depre­ci­ates as much as 35 per­cent of its value within the first two years off the lot.

One could argue that it worked great because they got a new car and saved money off of the total price. The prob­lem is that the pay­ments of a new car are obvi­ously more than the pay­ments for the clunker. Also, the buyer’s insur­ance pre­mi­ums will sky­rocket com­pared to what they were. Add it all up and peo­ple really did not save any money.

CARS required cus­tomers to trade-in their vehi­cles to be scrapped. Dealerships typ­i­cally offer much less for trade-ins than if some­one would have sold the vehi­cle them­selves. The rebate is given to off­set the trade-in, but the cus­tomer still takes a loss because he or she could have got­ten more for the vehi­cle by not trad­ing it in. The Obama admin­is­tra­tion may have been try­ing to help automak­ers and con­sumers, but the con­sumers were on the wrong end of that deal.

The pur­pose of CARS was to encour­age con­sumers to stim­u­late the econ­omy. However, the gov­ern­ment for­got to tell cus­tomers it was the United States econ­omy they were talk­ing about stim­u­lat­ing. A Sept. 2 arti­cle from Forbes​.com reported that 19 per­cent of vehi­cles pur­chased through the clunker pro­gram were Toyota mod­els. I am so glad the gov­ern­ment gave us a great sav­ings pro­gram so that we could help Japan sell cars in our country.

The arti­cle also stated that August was the high­est month of car sales nation­wide through the first eight months in 2009. Hyundai, Subaru and Kia all had increases of at least 47 per­cent over August of last year, while Ford had a 17 per­cent increase.

Congress allot­ted $3 bil­lion toward the pro­gram and when it ended on Aug. 24, it had used $2.87 bil­lion, accord­ing to CARS​.gov. The pro­gram was sched­uled to end Nov. 1 or until funds ran out. Since the gov­ern­ment knew that the funds would not last until then, they cut the pro­gram short.

I pur­chased a vehi­cle over the sum­mer while cash for clunk­ers was still avail­able, but I didn’t “take advan­tage” of the offer. I am all for being green and help­ing the envi­ron­ment, but CARS just didn’t seem to make sense to me. For now, I am per­fectly happy with my six-year-old, four-wheel drive that gets 18 miles to the gallon.